An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Framework for Supervisory Control System Design in Smart Municipal Solid Waste Management

Authors

  • Shirin Naderi Department of Structural, Geotechnical and Building Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Italy
  • Mohammad Safarpour Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Norway
  • Reyhane Salehnejad Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
  • Amirhossein Ahmadi Institute for Nanomaterials, Advanced Technologies and Innovation, Technical University of Liberec, Czech Republic

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15157/eil.2026.4.1.21-38

Keywords:

Multi-criteria decision-making, Supervisory control systems, Smart waste management, AHP-entropy hybrid weighting, TOPSIS, VIKOR, PROMETHEE II, Sensitivity analysis

Abstract

The transition of municipal solid waste (MSW) management from periodic, manually scheduled operations to continuously monitored, data-driven systems require a decision layer capable of converting heterogeneous sensor and operational data into reliable control actions. This study proposes and computationally validates an integrated multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework as the cognitive decision layer of a four-layer supervisory control architecture comprising sensing, edge/communication, cognitive decision, and actuation layers. Eight criteria covering economic, environmental, technical, social, and control dimensions, including control-loop responsiveness and data-integration scalability, are used to evaluate five representative MSW management alternatives: sanitary landfilling, waste-to-energy incineration, material recovery facilities, composting/anaerobic digestion, and an Internet of Things (IoT)-enabled smart integrated recovery system. Criterion weights are determined using a hybrid approach combining the subjective Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and objective Shannon entropy method, achieving a strong AHP consistency ratio (CR = 0.0047). The resulting weights are applied to three independent ranking methods: TOPSIS, VIKOR, and PROMETHEE II. Their results are consolidated using Borda rank aggregation and evaluated through Spearman rank-correlation analysis. All three methods consistently identify the IoT-enabled smart integrated recovery system as the best alternative, with TOPSIS, VIKOR, and PROMETHEE II values of CC = 0.7045, Q = 0.000, and net flow = 0.3665, respectively. A one-at-a-time sensitivity analysis with ±30% weight perturbations confirms the stability of the top-ranked alternative. The complete computational pipeline is implemented in open, reproducible Python code. The proposed framework provides control and environmental engineers with a transparent and auditable approach for integrating multi-criteria reasoning into real-time MSW management and identifying criteria requiring careful practical assessment.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-10

How to Cite

Naderi, S., Safarpour, M., Salehnejad, R., & Ahmadi, A. (2026). An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Framework for Supervisory Control System Design in Smart Municipal Solid Waste Management. Environmental Industry Letters, 4(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.15157/eil.2026.4.1.21-38